英語演講稿集合4篇

　　演講稿具有邏輯嚴(yán)密，態(tài)度明確，觀點(diǎn)鮮明的特點(diǎn)。在快速變化和不斷變革的新時(shí)代，演講稿的使用越來越廣泛，演講稿的注意事項(xiàng)有許多，你確定會(huì)寫嗎？以下是小編為大家整理的英語演講稿，歡迎大家借鑒與參考，希望對(duì)大家有所幫助。

英語演講稿1

親愛的老師和同學(xué)們：

　　我很高興在這里說點(diǎn)什么。這時(shí)，我想談?wù)勎业腵愛好。

　　我有很多愛好。首先，我喜歡玩電子游戲。電腦游戲很酷。我可以玩一整天。第二，我喜歡各種運(yùn)動(dòng)。我喜歡新鮮空氣和陽光。和朋友踢足球很有趣。

　　在海里游泳是我最喜歡的。我也喜歡在家畫畫。此外，我喜歡音樂。我喜歡唱歌。我經(jīng)常在街上散步時(shí)唱電影歌曲。當(dāng)然，我每天都學(xué)英語。如你所知，英語在世界各地都被使用。所以我學(xué)英語很努力。我希望有一天我能環(huán)游世界，和外國人說英語。

　　還有更多我喜歡做的。還有我想說的。也許下次我可以告訴你更多。謝謝大家的傾聽。

英語演講稿2

　　Sexual Harrassment Hearings Concerning Judge Clarence ThomasMr.Chairman, Senator Thurmond, members of the committee, my name is Anita F.

　　Hill, and I am a professor of law at the University of Oklahoma.

　　I was born on a farm in Okmulgee County, Oklahoma, in 1956.

　　I am the youngest of 13 children.

　　I had my early education in Okmulgee County.

　　My father, Albert Hill, is a farmer in that area.

　　My mothers name is Irma Hill.

　　She is also a farmer and a housewife.

　　My childhood was one of a lot of hard work and not much money, but it was one of solid family affection, as represented by my parents.

　　I was reared in a religious atmosphere in the Baptist faith, and I have been a member of the Antioch Baptist Church in Tulsa, Oklahoma, since 1983.

　　It is a very warm part of my life at the present time.

　　For my undergraduate work, I went to Oklahoma State University and graduated from there in 1977.

　　I am attaching to this statement a copy of my resume for further details of my education.

　　I graduated from the university with academic honors and proceeded to the Yale Law School, where I received my JD degree in 1980.

　　Upon graduation from law school, I became a practicing lawyer with the Washington, DC, firm of Ward, Hardraker, and Ross.

　　In 1981, I was introduced to now Judge Thomas by a mutual friend.

　　Judge Thomas told me that he was anticipating a political appointment, and he asked if I would be interested in working with him.

　　He was, in fact, appointed as Assistant Secretary of Education for Civil Rights.

　　After he had taken that post, he asked if I would become his assistant, and I accepted that position.

　　In my early period there, I had two major projects.

　　The first was an article I wrote for Judge Thomas signature on the education of minority students.

　　The second was the organization of a seminar on high-risk students which was abandoned because Judge Thomas transferred to the EEOC where he became the chairman of that office.

　　During this period at the Department of Education, my working relationship with Judge Thomas was positive.

　　I had a good deal of responsibility and independence.

　　I thought he respected my work and that he trusted my judgment.

　　After approximately three months of working there, he asked me to go out socially with him.

　　What happened next and telling the world about it are the two most difficult things -- experiences of my life.

　　It is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration and sleepless number -- a great number of sleepless nights that I am able to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone but my close friends.

　　I declined the invitation to go out socially with him and explained to him that I thought it would jeopardize what at the time I considered to be a very good working relationship.

　　I had a normal social life with other men outside of the office.

　　I believed then, as now, that having a social relationship with a person who was supervising my work would be ill-advised.

　　I was very uncomfortable with the idea and told him so.

　　I thought that by saying no and explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social suggestions.

　　However, to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several occasions.

　　He pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to him.

　　These incidents took place in his office or mine.

　　They were in the form of private conversations which would not have been overheard by anyone else.

　　My working relationship became even more strained when Judge Thomas began to use work situations to discuss sex.

　　On these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government cafeteria.

　　After a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of sexual matters.

　　His conversations were very vivid.

　　He spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes.

　　He talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large penises or large breasts involved in various sex acts.

　　On several occasions, Thomas told me graphically of his own sexual prowess.

　　Because I was extremely uncomfortable talking about sex with him at all and particularly in such a graphic way, I told him that I did not want to talk about these subjects.

　　I would also try to change the subject to education matters or to nonsexual personal matters such as his background or his beliefs.

　　My efforts to change the subject were rarely successful.

　　Throughout the period of these conversations, he also from time to time asked me for social engagements.

　　My reaction to these conversations was to avoid them by eliminating opportunities for us to engage in extended conversations.

　　This was difficult because at the time I was his only assistant at the Office of Education -- or Office for Civil Rights.

　　During the latter part of my time at the Department of Education, the social pressures and any conversation of his offensive behavior ended.

　　I began both to believe and hope that our working relationship could be a proper, cordial, and professional one.

　　When Judge Thomas was made chair of the EEOC, I needed to face the question of whether to go with him.

　　I was asked to do so, and I did.

　　The work itself was interesting, and at that time it appeared that the sexual overtures which had so troubled me had ended.

　　I also faced the realistic fact that I had no alternative job.

　　While I might have gone back to private practice, perhaps in my old firm or at another, I was dedicated to civil rights work, and my first choice was to be in that field.

　　Moreover, the Department of Education itself was a dubious venture.

　　President Reagan was seeking to abolish the entire department.

　　For my first months at the EEOC, where I continued to be an assistant to Judge Thomas, there were no sexual conversations or overtures.

　　However, during the fall and winter of 1982, these began again.

　　The comments were random and ranged from pressing me about why I didnt go out with him to remarks about my personal appearance.

　　I remember his saying that some day I would have to tell him the real reason that I wouldnt go out with him.

　　He began to show displeasure in his tone and voice and his demeanor and his continued pressure for an explanation.

　　He commented on what I was wearing in terms of whether it made me more or less sexually attractive.

　　The incidents occurred in his inner office at the EEOC.

　　One of the oddest episodes I remember was an occasion in which Thomas was drinking a Coke in his office.

　　He got up from the table at which we were working, went over to his desk to get the Coke, looked at the can and asked, Who has pubic hair on my Coke? On other occasions, he referred to the size of his own penis as being larger than normal, and he also spoke on some occasions of the pleasures he had given to women with oral sex.

　　At this point, late 1982, I began to feel severe stress on the job.

　　I began to be concerned that Clarence Thomas might take out his anger with me by degrading me or not giving me important assignments.

　　I also thought that he might find an excuse for dismissing me.

　　In January of 1983, I began looking for another job.

　　I was handicapped because I feared that, if he found out, he might make it difficult for me to find other employment and I might be dismissed from the job I had.

　　Another factor that made my search more difficult was that there was a period -- this was during a period of a hiring freeze in the government.

　　In February of 1983, I was hospitalized for five days on an emergency basis for acute stomach pain which I attributed to stress on the job.

　　Once out of the hospital, I became more committed to find other employment and sought further to minimize my contact with Thomas.

　　This became easier when Allison Duncan (sp) became office director, because most of my work was then funneled through her and I had contact with Clarence Thomas mostly in staff meetings.

　　In the spring of 1983, an opportunity to teach at Oral Roberts University opened up.

　　I participated in a seminar -- taught an afternoon session and seminar at Oral Roberts University.

　　The dean of the university saw me teaching and inquired as to whether I would be interested in furthering -- pursuing a career in teaching, beginning at Oral Roberts University.

　　I agreed to take the job in large part because of my desire to escape the pressures I felt at the EEOC due to Judge Thomas.

　　When I informed him that I was leaving in July, I recall that his response was that now I would no longer have an excuse for not going out with him.

　　I told him that I still preferred not to do so.

　　At some time after that meeting, he asked if he could take me to dinner at the end of the term.

　　When I declined, he assured me that the dinner was a professional courtesy only and not a social invitation.

　　I reluctantly agreed to accept that invitation, but only if it was at the every end of a working day.

　　On, as I recall, the last day of my employment at the EEOC in the summer of 1983, I did have dinner with Clarence Thomas.

　　We went directly from work to a restaurant near the office.

　　We talked about the work I had done, both at education and at the EEOC.

　　He told me that he was pleased with all of it except for an article and speech that I had done for him while we were at the Office for Civil Rights.

　　Finally, he made a comment that I will vividly remember.

　　He said that if I ever told anyone of his behavior that it would ruin his career.

　　This was not an apology, nor was it an explanation.

　　That was his last remark about the possibility of our going out or reference to his behavior.

　　In July of 1983, I left Washington, DC area and have had minimal contact with Judge Clarence Thomas since.

　　I am of course aware from the press that some questions have been raised about conversations I had with Judge Clarence Thomas after I left the EEOC.

　　From 1983 until today, I have seen Judge Thomas only twice.

　　On one occasion, I needed to get a reference from him, and on another he made a public appearance in Tulsa.

　　On one occasion he called me at home and we had an inconsequential conversation.

　　On one occasion he called me without reaching me, and I returned the call without reaching him, and nothing came of it.

　　I have on at least three occasions, been asked to act as a conduit to him for others.

　　I knew his secretary, Diane Holt.

　　We had worked together at both EEOC and education.

　　There were occasions on which I spoke to her, and on some of these occasions undoubtedly I passed on some casual comment to then Chairman Thomas.

　　There were a series of calls in the first three months of 1985, occasioned by a group in Tulsa, which wished to have a civil rights conference.

　　They wanted Judge Thomas to be the speaker and enlisted my assistance for this purpose.

　　I did call in January and February to no effect, and finally suggested to the person directly involved, Susan Cahal (ph) that she put the matter into her own hands and call directly.

　　She did so in March of 1985.

　　In connection with that March invitation, Ms.

　　Cahal (ph) wanted conference materials for the seminar and some research was needed.

　　I was asked to try to get the information and did attempted to do so.

　　There was another call about another possible conference in July of 1985.

　　In August of 1987, I was in Washington, DC and I did call Diane Holt.

　　In the course of this conversation, she asked me how long I was going to be in town and I told her.

　　It is recorded in the message as August 15.

　　It was, in fact, August 20th.

　　She told me about Judge Thomass marriage and I did say congratulate him.

　　It is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration that I am able to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone except my closest friends.

　　As Ive said before these last few days have been very trying and very hard for me and it hasnt just been the last few days this week.

　　It has actually been over a month now that I have been under the strain of this issue.

　　Telling the world is the most difficult experience of my life, but it is very close to having to live through the experience that occasion this meeting.

　　I may have used poor judgment early on in my relationship with this issue.

　　I was aware, however, that telling at any point in my career could adversely affect my future career.

　　And I did not want early on to burn all the bridges to the EEOC.

　　As I said, I may have used poor judgment.

　　Perhaps I should have taken angry or even militant steps, both when I was in the agency, or after I left it.

　　But I must confess to the world that the course that I took seemed the better as well as the easier approach.

　　I declined any comment to newspapers, but later when Senate staff asked me about these matters I felt I had a duty to report.

　　I have no personal vendetta against Clarence Thomas.

　　I seek only to provide the committee with information which it may regard as relevant.

　　It would have been more comfortable to remain silent.

　　I took no initiative to inform anyone.

　　But when I was asked by a representative of this committee to report my experience, I felt that I had to tell the truth.

　　I could not keep silent.thanksgiving, although it is an act of the verb, but it is not the only action required and, more importantly, needs to be done in good faith.

　　easy to say that thanksgiving is gratitude, heartfelt gratitude.

　　you know that every year in november the fourth thursday, what holiday are you? the united states are of thanksgiving.

　　at that time each year, americans should thank god.

　　of our high school students, we would also like to thank god, but given our lives this is the god - our parents.

　　i like most people, from small to large the most loved themselves, most worthy of the appreciation of their natural parents is that they both in material or spiritual growth i have played a crucial role, naturally, for their such as days of my high thinking deep sea conditions are taken for granted.

　　i have a first-hand experience with their parents that they do not talk back, making them less angry with their parents to talk about many hearts, with their resource sharing, the parent every day, so my thanksgiving plan is: let them less angry and more happy, happy at all times.

　　do not say, the results are really marvelous! previously, the sum of my parents for some bring frivolous unhappy much, and i always strongly insist their position, they have a tense atmosphere will be like a boil water boiling up, eventually causing a break up in discord.

　　later, after careful thought, i know that are wrong and should not be as to calm, patience and a lot of parents only.

　　so parents do not want to see me unhappy they prepare to try to implement a set of thanksgiving program, making their parents at any time to face all broad smiles on their faces, but also repay some of my feelings of parents.

　　say .

　　one night, sitting in my chair on the idea of the topic, his hands up first.

　　happened to see a mother, she has misunderstood me, saying that does not concentrate on my homework, the.

　　although i feel wronged, but in order to avoid a war in order to allow mother not angry, in order to thanksgiving plans, the success of my bear, did not explain, and said: in the future, no longer can.

　　this also because i know that mothers personality: forever for their own opinion defense.

　　i did not expect that, at this moment, my mind has not the past quarrel at the time of the burden, but also very happy and feel the feelings of gratitude are revealing.

　　i did not expect to make is this: not long after, but mother from warrington - mimis a laugh.

　　how kind, the scheme you good results! in short, let the parents are pleased the method is a kind of thanksgiving.i am happy to join with you today in what will go down in history as the greatest demonstration for freedom in the history of our nation.

　　five score years ago, a great american, in whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the emancipation proclamation.

　　this momentous decree came as a great beacon light of hope to millions of negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice.

　　it came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of their captivity.

　　but one hundred years later, the negro still is not free.

　　one hundred years later, the life of the negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination.

　　one hundred years later, the negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity.

　　one hundred years later, the negro is still languished in the corners of american society and finds himself an exile in his own land.

　　and so weve come here today to dramatize a shameful condition.

　　in a sense weve come to our nations capital to cash a check.

　　when the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the constitution and the declaration of independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every american was to fall heir.

　　this note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the ";unalienable rights"; of ";life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."; it is obvious today that america has defaulted on this promissory note, insofar as her citizens of color are concerned.

　　instead of honoring this sacred obligation, america has given the negro people a bad check, a check which has come back marked ";insufficient funds."

英語演講稿3

　　大家好，我今天演講的題目是“我的夢想”。

　　每個(gè)人都有夢想，而且很好，我也不例外。我有一個(gè)小小的夢想，當(dāng)我達(dá)到目標(biāo)時(shí)，我會(huì)實(shí)現(xiàn)更多的夢想。開始，我還是個(gè)嬰兒，一心想變得很強(qiáng)壯，像少林寺里的孩子一樣，武功高強(qiáng)。但是我覺得離開父母去很遠(yuǎn)的地方練武，辛苦，有點(diǎn)舍不得。小時(shí)候，我有一個(gè)夢想，我希望我有錢。大人問：小姑娘，有了錢你打算怎么辦？我要去買泡泡糖"如果你有很多錢？

　　我打算買很多泡泡糖。"如果你有錢花的話？我會(huì)買泡泡糖工廠。"天真的童年我們的確有一顆善良的心，幸福和快樂是同一首曲子。

　　慢慢進(jìn)入小學(xué)，課程越來越深，知識(shí)越來越多。會(huì)感受到壓力�，F(xiàn)在我有一個(gè)夢想。我希望我沒有；我每天沒有很多作業(yè)要做。玩的有點(diǎn)剝奪，而我們40%的.日子都禁錮在教室里，很多時(shí)間都在學(xué)習(xí)。但是在學(xué)習(xí)面前，是一種模糊的知識(shí)。俗話說，一種罕見的困惑。對(duì)事物的理解，從封建主義到資本主義，越大越覺得自己的觀點(diǎn)是正確的。每天放學(xué)回家后忙了一天一夜的課，他又困又累，吃不到深夜吃的食物。這樣的生活很單調(diào)，可能有時(shí)候會(huì)想念我的很多小學(xué)同學(xué)，有時(shí)候會(huì)帶著一節(jié)課或者一副朦朧的睡相。討厭死板的校服，我從來不到處穿。周六，周日；時(shí)間很短，孩子很想磨煉，慢慢了解生活；太難了，努力吧，夢想好了，我會(huì)努力讓每個(gè)人都生活起來，早起晚睡，把握住自己，不再松懈。我也想為他們的夢想而奮斗。

　　我的演講結(jié)束了，謝謝！

英語演講稿4

尊敬的各位領(lǐng)導(dǎo)、老師：

　　大家下午好！我叫xx，原來在xx小學(xué)工作，近幾年來一直從事小學(xué)英語的教學(xué)，今年因工作調(diào)動(dòng)，調(diào)整到我們xx小學(xué)工作，我感到非常的高興，同時(shí)，也非常感謝我們學(xué)校領(lǐng)導(dǎo)能給我這樣一次展示自我、成就自我的機(jī)會(huì)。我今天我競聘的崗位是三、四年級(jí)的英語教學(xué)。

　　首先我說一下自己的基本情況和工作業(yè)績：我xx年畢業(yè)于xx師專數(shù)學(xué)系，后分配到xx中學(xué)從事數(shù)學(xué)教學(xué)，xx年開始改教初中英語，xx年因身體狀況，調(diào)入小學(xué)從事小學(xué)英語教學(xué)至今，xx年自考大學(xué)本科畢業(yè)，xx年被評(píng)為中學(xué)一級(jí)教師。

　　自工作以來，我一直兢兢業(yè)業(yè)，勤奮工作，所教科目成績一直據(jù)全鎮(zhèn)前列，特別是近幾年來從事小學(xué)英語教學(xué)，所教班級(jí)多次獲得全鎮(zhèn)第一名，個(gè)人也多次被評(píng)為鎮(zhèn)教育先進(jìn)工作者、優(yōu)秀教師，區(qū)優(yōu)秀教師，個(gè)人年考核優(yōu)秀等次的榮譽(yù)稱號(hào)，并有多篇論文在市級(jí)報(bào)紙發(fā)表。

　　下面我談一下，我競聘英語教師的幾個(gè)優(yōu)勢和條件：

　　1。有良好的師德

　　我為人處事的原則是：老老實(shí)實(shí)做人，認(rèn)認(rèn)真真工作，開開心心生活。自己一貫注重個(gè)人品德素質(zhì)的培養(yǎng)，努力做到尊重領(lǐng)導(dǎo)，團(tuán)結(jié)同志，工作負(fù)責(zé)，辦事公道，不計(jì)較個(gè)人得失，對(duì)工作對(duì)同志有公心，愛心，平常心和寬容心。自從參加工作以來，我首先在師德上嚴(yán)格要求自己，要做一個(gè)合格的人民教師！認(rèn)真學(xué)習(xí)和領(lǐng)會(huì)上級(jí)教育主管部門的文件精神，與時(shí)俱進(jìn)，愛崗敬業(yè)，為人師表，熱愛學(xué)生，尊重學(xué)生，爭取讓每個(gè)學(xué)生都能享受到最好的教育，都能有不同程度的發(fā)

　　2。有較高的專業(yè)水平

　　我從xx師專數(shù)學(xué)系畢業(yè)后曾到xx師范大學(xué)進(jìn)修英語教學(xué)培訓(xùn)，系統(tǒng)而又牢固地掌握了英語教學(xué)的專業(yè)知識(shí)。多年來始終在教學(xué)第一線致力于小學(xué)英語教學(xué)及研究，使自己的專業(yè)知識(shí)得到進(jìn)一步充實(shí)、更新和擴(kuò)展。

　　3。有較強(qiáng)的教學(xué)能力

　　從選擇教師這門職業(yè)的第一天起，我最大的心愿就是做一名受學(xué)生歡迎的好老師，為了這個(gè)心愿，我一直在不懈努力著。要求自己做到牢固掌握本學(xué)科的基本理論知識(shí)。

　　熟悉相關(guān)學(xué)科的文化知識(shí)，不斷更新知識(shí)結(jié)構(gòu)，精通業(yè)務(wù)，精心施教，把握好教學(xué)的難點(diǎn)重點(diǎn)，認(rèn)真探索教學(xué)規(guī)律，鉆研教學(xué)藝術(shù)，努力形成自己的教學(xué)特色。我的教學(xué)風(fēng)格和教學(xué)效果普遍受到學(xué)生的認(rèn)可和歡迎。

　　以上所述情況，是我競聘英語教師的優(yōu)勢條件，假如我有幸競聘上崗，這些優(yōu)勢條件將有助于我更好的開展英語教學(xué)工作。

　　如果我有幸競聘成功，能擔(dān)任三四年級(jí)英語教師的話，我將從以下方面開展工作。

　　一是認(rèn)真貫徹執(zhí)行黨的教育路線、方針、政策和學(xué)校的各項(xiàng)決定，加強(qiáng)學(xué)習(xí)，積極進(jìn)取，求真務(wù)實(shí)，開拓創(chuàng)新，不斷提高自己的綜合素質(zhì)、創(chuàng)新能力，用自己的勤奮加智慧，完成好教學(xué)任務(wù)。使我校的.英語教學(xué)上一個(gè)大的臺(tái)階。

　　二是做一個(gè)科研型的教師。教師的從教之日，正是重新學(xué)習(xí)之時(shí)。新時(shí)代要求教師具備的不只是操作技巧，還要有直面新情況、分析新問題、解決新矛盾的本領(lǐng)。進(jìn)行目標(biāo)明確、有針對(duì)性解決我校的英語教學(xué)難題。

　　做一個(gè)理念新的教師

　　目前，新一輪的基礎(chǔ)教育改革早已在我市全面推開，作為新課改的實(shí)踐者，要在認(rèn)真學(xué)習(xí)新課程理念的基礎(chǔ)上，結(jié)合自己所教的學(xué)科，積極探索有效的教學(xué)方法。大力改革教學(xué)，積極探索實(shí)施創(chuàng)新教學(xué)模式。把英語知識(shí)與學(xué)生的生活相結(jié)合，為學(xué)生創(chuàng)設(shè)一個(gè)富有生活氣息的真實(shí)的學(xué)習(xí)情境，同時(shí)注重學(xué)生的探究發(fā)現(xiàn)，引導(dǎo)學(xué)生在學(xué)習(xí)中學(xué)會(huì)合作交流，提高學(xué)習(xí)能力。

　　做一個(gè)富有愛心的老師

　　“不愛學(xué)生就教不好學(xué)生”，“愛學(xué)生就要愛每一個(gè)學(xué)生”。作為一名教師，要無私地奉獻(xiàn)愛，處處播灑愛，使我的學(xué)生在愛的激勵(lì)下，增強(qiáng)自信，勇于創(chuàng)新，不斷進(jìn)取，成長為撐起祖國一片藍(lán)天的棟梁。用質(zhì)樸的心愛護(hù)學(xué)生，用誠摯的情感染學(xué)生，用精湛的教學(xué)藝術(shù)熏陶學(xué)生，用忘我的工作態(tài)度影響學(xué)生。

　　尊敬的各位領(lǐng)導(dǎo)，各位老師，我會(huì)珍惜現(xiàn)有的每一個(gè)機(jī)會(huì)，努力工作，發(fā)揮出自己的最大能力，以高尚的情操、飽滿的熱情上好自己的英語課程，享受我的教學(xué)樂趣！

　　最后我想說：做教師，我無悔！做英語教師，我快樂！

【英語演講稿】相關(guān)文章：

英語演講稿：我們什么學(xué)英語03-21

英語經(jīng)典演講稿03-11

英語的演講稿11-05

經(jīng)典英語演講稿04-26

英語優(yōu)秀演講稿03-31

英語演講稿06-22

英語演講稿08-08

希望英語的演講稿11-10

(精選)英語演講稿07-09

英語演講稿（精選）07-10